Skip to main content

August 5, 2017 Introduction and Invitation

August 5, 2017
Beginning about 1997, I began documenting people's evaluation lives by interviewing them to ask what evaluation is to them and to give examples of them evaluating.

In 2016 I published a book (Volume #150 in the American Evaluation Association's New Directions for Evaluation series) about the evaluation lives of seven professional evaluators. Rather than publish their transcripts, they used our interview experience to create articles which are included in that volume. In 2018, a sequel was published about the evaluation lives of twenty-nine additional professional evaluators (Volume #157) that is available through Wiley. Here is a link to a pre-publication draft and here are the transcripts of my interviews with 24 of those evaluators (all those who gave permission to make them available to the public.

However, my original interest was in understanding and sharing the evaluation lives of every day people (not just professional evaluators) in their personal as well as professional lives. I wanted to do something like Studs Terkel did by sharing quotes from extensive interviews with people about various aspects of their lives (see for example Studs Terkel's 1974 Working: People talk about what they do all day and how they feel about what they do.

After considering alternative ways to share the stories of the people I've interviewed which are not shared in the two publications mentioned earlier, and after consulting with many of them, I've decided to create this blog in which I plan to discuss various lessons I've learned from all the people I've interviewed, as well as my own perspectives. Links to interview transcripts of all those who agreed to let me do so are included: some have their names attached and others will remain anonymous, depending on their preferences. Others may not be linked at all but could be quoted if the participants give permission. Some interviewees didn't want to share their transcript with the world but approved me quoting them anonymously.

If you are interested in sharing your own evaluation life stories, I invite you to reply to this post with a link to a written version that I can add to one of the folders mentioned above or email it to me at ddwbyu@gmail.com. Or, if you prefer, contact me and I will happily interview you and transcribe your interview for inclusion if you decide you want to have it as part of this collection.

Thanks for your interest in this project. I'm excited to share these stories participants have told me. And I hope using this blog and these stories will help you explore and improve your own evaluation life and the lives of others you might be influencing.

Looking forward to some helpful dialog!  David Williams




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evaluators in IT

One of my major interests early on in my research into evaluators' lives was how different disciplines prepare their novitiates in doing evaluation within each discipline. Many of the interviews I'm linking to this blog come from people representing different disciplines and it would be interesting to search among them to see if there are patterns across representatives from similar disciplines. ogy field. I am linking some of their interviews to this post to facilitate looking for patterns across them (they are all available through the folders linked my first post in August): ST's (an experienced IT professional and now retired professor) interviews are here : MK's (an IT student) interviews are here : BL's (an experienced IT professor with years of professional experience) interviews are here :

Rationality and Evaluation

This article illustrates how important some evaluations can be and the fact that they are best made with a combination of rationality AND intuition, gut, feelings and other components that aren't always perceived as being rational. The role of rationality in evaluation came up in many of my interviews.  The following quotes from an interview with Chauncey Riddle, a professor emeritus of philosophy at BYU illustrates some of the issues, which I summarize this way: Most people believe evaluations should be rational but in practice, they go with their feelings, hunches, the Spirit, their conscience, the Light of Christ and/or other inclinations that don't always appear to be rational. R: Well, I've learned that yes, that you can't evaluate without real help from the Spirit. But if you use your own judgment solely, you're very error-prone. DDW: Even if you're trying to be righteous and... R: Even if you're trying to do what's right. And the only ...