Skip to main content

August 5, 2017 Introduction and Invitation

August 5, 2017
Beginning about 1997, I began documenting people's evaluation lives by interviewing them to ask what evaluation is to them and to give examples of them evaluating.

In 2016 I published a book (Volume #150 in the American Evaluation Association's New Directions for Evaluation series) about the evaluation lives of seven professional evaluators. Rather than publish their transcripts, they used our interview experience to create articles which are included in that volume. In 2018, a sequel was published about the evaluation lives of twenty-nine additional professional evaluators (Volume #157) that is available through Wiley. Here is a link to a pre-publication draft and here are the transcripts of my interviews with 24 of those evaluators (all those who gave permission to make them available to the public.

However, my original interest was in understanding and sharing the evaluation lives of every day people (not just professional evaluators) in their personal as well as professional lives. I wanted to do something like Studs Terkel did by sharing quotes from extensive interviews with people about various aspects of their lives (see for example Studs Terkel's 1974 Working: People talk about what they do all day and how they feel about what they do.

After considering alternative ways to share the stories of the people I've interviewed which are not shared in the two publications mentioned earlier, and after consulting with many of them, I've decided to create this blog in which I plan to discuss various lessons I've learned from all the people I've interviewed, as well as my own perspectives. Links to interview transcripts of all those who agreed to let me do so are included: some have their names attached and others will remain anonymous, depending on their preferences. Others may not be linked at all but could be quoted if the participants give permission. Some interviewees didn't want to share their transcript with the world but approved me quoting them anonymously.

If you are interested in sharing your own evaluation life stories, I invite you to reply to this post with a link to a written version that I can add to one of the folders mentioned above or email it to me at ddwbyu@gmail.com. Or, if you prefer, contact me and I will happily interview you and transcribe your interview for inclusion if you decide you want to have it as part of this collection.

Thanks for your interest in this project. I'm excited to share these stories participants have told me. And I hope using this blog and these stories will help you explore and improve your own evaluation life and the lives of others you might be influencing.

Looking forward to some helpful dialog!  David Williams




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LDS views on learning to use both thinking and feeling in most evaluation situations

The following quotes are taken from interviews M held with B in 2014-15. Both M and B are LDS and they used that fact to explore several themes that I've seen in my interviews with LDS people about making evaluative decisions as individuals, in families, in church councils, in work settings, and more. The interviews themselves are available here . Many others are available in the first blog post in August 2017. B: In our marriage, the decision came from the basis that husband and wife are equal and therefore they should have equal say in the decisions.  It has never mattered that I'm the wage-earner in our home and that essentially 100% of our income comes from me.  It isn't my money and her money.  It is our money.  And therefore I have no more power in my voice than she does in terms of how we choose to spend the money, because we are equal.  And that's been the policy ever since the beginning because I think that's how God wants it to be.  At least...
DDW Fieldnotes 9/23/2011—Research and Project Ideas Recorded 9/23/2011 and transcription finished 9/26/2011 Research Framework.amr File DDW: Okay, I’m walking along thinking here. I want to talk about my research project ideas. Yesterday I got working on analyzing some of the stories from Terkel’s “Working” book. And they’re so rich and full of evaluation. So I wanted to start sorting out some of what I’ve got. 1. First, I have sources of lived evaluation stories from “working”, from all the other books Studs Terkel has written and that other people like him have done, including most biographies. Which would include ethnographies and  phenomenologies (like the ones by Max VanManen and his students at http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/sources/ , (1min) journal articles, stories, others. There’s an endless stream of those. 2. I also have my own case studies that I’m conducting with people. And one thing I’ve struggled with those is to know how deep I should take them...