Skip to main content

Rationality and Evaluation

This article illustrates how important some evaluations can be and the fact that they are best made with a combination of rationality AND intuition, gut, feelings and other components that aren't always perceived as being rational.

The role of rationality in evaluation came up in many of my interviews.  The following quotes from an interview with Chauncey Riddle, a professor emeritus of philosophy at BYU illustrates some of the issues, which I summarize this way: Most people believe evaluations should be rational but in practice, they go with their feelings, hunches, the Spirit, their conscience, the Light of Christ and/or other inclinations that don't always appear to be rational.


R: Well, I've learned that yes, that you can't evaluate without real help from the Spirit. But if you use your own judgment solely, you're very error-prone.

DDW: Even if you're trying to be righteous and...

R: Even if you're trying to do what's right. And the only real safeguard you have is to make sure that you and the Spirit are on the same wavelength. And if you are, it may appear to be a foolish thing you're doing, but it will turn out alright.

DDW: Now that's a theme I've heard from a lot of the people I've interviewed—they'll often say, I have these professional standards I was supposed to follow. I had peers around me that were telling me what they thought I should do. I had precedents, things that have happened in the past that told me what I should do. But eventually, I went with my gut feeling or my feelings about it, and about what was the right thing to do. And sometimes if they're LDS, they'll say, that was the Spirit, sometimes if they're not they'll just go with those other words. But essentially they’re saying, evaluation can be very rational and have all these rational parts to it, but eventually, the tough decisions or the ones you look back on and feel really good about, have some element of the Spirit guiding you.


R: I don't believe that people are rational creatures. I think they try to be sometimes. Some individuals try to be rational. Others pride themselves for not being rational. But the rational ones wind up acting just like the ones who don't believe in rationality. They finally do what they feel like doing.There are no rational choices. Ultimately they're all irrational.


DDW: Irrational or a-rational?

R: Non-rational. You cannot rationally justify all choices. You can invent justifications for a lot of decisions, but ultimately every decision comes down to what people want to do. We never are in control of the facts on the case to know all the facts. We're never in control of all the possibilities for our actions. And therefore when we make a decision, we're always taking a leap of faith.

DDW: Like if you decide to marry somebody, you really don't know where that's going to go.

R: You don't. You take a leap of faith. Either faith in yourself or faith in God or faith in something. You can make all the rational determinations you want, and be very cool and calculating about it, but the reason always fails. You never get enough information to make your decision rational. We just aren't equipped to be able to do that. That's why righteousness is never, you can never be righteous on your own. Righteousness is doing the right thing at the right time for the right reason. And you have to be omniscient or omnipotent to pull that off. And since we're not, we're never righteous on our own. We're only righteous when we act in accordance with the instructions of He Who is righteous. The Savior is righteous. So the Savior is the source of all real good in this world. Anybody who makes a good decision, makes it with the Savior's help, whether they know it or not. No man is sufficient unto himself, though some pretend to be.

Anything can be justified rationally. You just invent the premises that you want and you need to conclude something. And everybody does it and everybody is good at it, because we’re taught that by our civilization.

DDW: The more successful people are even better at it.

R: Logic doesn’t prove that anything is true, because it all depends on your premises. You can make any premises you want for any argument. That’s what self-justification is: picking your premises so you can prove what you want.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

August 5, 2017 Introduction and Invitation

August 5, 2017 Beginning about 1997, I began documenting people's evaluation lives by interviewing them to ask what evaluation is to them and to give examples of them evaluating. In 2016 I published a book ( Volume #150 in the American Evaluation Association's New Directions for Evaluation series) about the evaluation lives of seven professional evaluators. Rather than publish their transcripts, they used our interview experience to create articles which are included in that volume. In 2018, a sequel was published about the evaluation lives of twenty-nine additional professional evaluators (Volume #157) that is available through Wiley. Here is a  link to a pre-publication draft  and here are the transcripts of my interviews with 24 of those evaluators (all those who gave permission to make them available to the public. However, my original interest was in understanding and sharing the evaluation lives of every day people (not just professional evaluators) in their perso...

LDS views on learning to use both thinking and feeling in most evaluation situations

The following quotes are taken from interviews M held with B in 2014-15. Both M and B are LDS and they used that fact to explore several themes that I've seen in my interviews with LDS people about making evaluative decisions as individuals, in families, in church councils, in work settings, and more. The interviews themselves are available here . Many others are available in the first blog post in August 2017. B: In our marriage, the decision came from the basis that husband and wife are equal and therefore they should have equal say in the decisions.  It has never mattered that I'm the wage-earner in our home and that essentially 100% of our income comes from me.  It isn't my money and her money.  It is our money.  And therefore I have no more power in my voice than she does in terms of how we choose to spend the money, because we are equal.  And that's been the policy ever since the beginning because I think that's how God wants it to be.  At least...
DDW Fieldnotes 9/23/2011—Research and Project Ideas Recorded 9/23/2011 and transcription finished 9/26/2011 Research Framework.amr File DDW: Okay, I’m walking along thinking here. I want to talk about my research project ideas. Yesterday I got working on analyzing some of the stories from Terkel’s “Working” book. And they’re so rich and full of evaluation. So I wanted to start sorting out some of what I’ve got. 1. First, I have sources of lived evaluation stories from “working”, from all the other books Studs Terkel has written and that other people like him have done, including most biographies. Which would include ethnographies and  phenomenologies (like the ones by Max VanManen and his students at http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/sources/ , (1min) journal articles, stories, others. There’s an endless stream of those. 2. I also have my own case studies that I’m conducting with people. And one thing I’ve struggled with those is to know how deep I should take them...